Is Aging an Accident of Evolution?
“Everyone has assumed we age by rust,” Kim said. “But then how do you explain animals that don’t age?”
Some tortoises lay eggs at the age of 100, he points out. There are whales that live to be 200, and clams that make it past 400. Those species use the same building blocks for their DNA, proteins and fats as humans, mice and nematode worms. The chemistry of the wear-and-tear process, including damage from oxygen free-radicals, should be the same in all cells, which makes it hard to explain why species have dramatically different life spans.
If aging is not a cost of unavoidable chemistry but is instead driven by changes in regulatory genes, the aging process may not be inevitable. It is at least theoretically possible to slow down or stop developmental drift.
(via Justin Blanton)
-
musicbrain liked this
-
smithsisdead
reblogged this from
jingc
-
nycbumpkin liked this
-
madh-avi
reblogged this from
jingc
-
willw2
reblogged this from
jingc
-
claudiacrayon liked this
-
mumblelard liked this
-
nixsantos liked this
-
ohayshay liked this
-
constellation
reblogged this from
jingc
-
morethan
reblogged this from
jingc
and added:
Hmmmm.. Interesting read.
-
taf
reblogged this from
jingc
and added:
Interesting research, but one particular bit of reasoning (in bold) is dodgy. The chemistry of the wear-and-tear...
-
itsamazing liked this
-
scurvyseadog liked this
-
jingc
posted this